PrimeFaces vs ICEfaces – ICEfaces President and CEO Brian McKinney’s response
Tensions ease between the two parties over code-usage
We had received extensive feedback from the ICEfaces development community that they wanted to be able to integrate some of the popular jQuery library elements within their ICEfaces / JSF 2 applications. We were aware that Prime Technology had done a great job of wrapping JQuery and YUI components so that they would work in JSF 2 applications. We chose to leverage the PrimeFaces 2 open source component library because it represented the best JSF 2 compliant solution for accessing jQuery components at the time.
Code changes were required however in order to integrate the select PrimeFaces components into the ICEfaces application framework, and to implement some of the other feature enhancement requests we had received from our customers. In order to meet our support obligations and our committed service level agreements, ICEsoft had to retain the ability to make code changes on an ongoing basis so we could resolve bugs and affect solutions in a timely manner. We had originally hoped that we could achieve this under some kind of sponsorship arrangement with the PrimeFaces project. Unfortunately the two parties were unable to come to terms and we made the decision to fork the project.
ICEsoft is a strong and active proponent of the open source model, and a big piece of the open source culture is this notion of taking a piece of open source software, building upon it and enhancing it, and finally returning those enhancements back to the community for others to do the same. Which is exactly what happened here.
In the course of our integration of various PrimeFaces, jQuery and YUI components we made over two hundred code submissions to resolve bugs or provide enhancements to the components. The data table is a good example of feature enhancements that were made. Data tables are traditionally one of the most popular and frequently used components in the the web application developers toolbox. With its enhancements, the data table component is now one of the richest and most comprehensive components in the industry. All of which, the enhancements the bug fixes etc. was returned back to the open source community for users to freely use and further enhance on their own.
No ethical lines were crossed. We believe that everything we have done is fully consistent with the primary intent and spirit of open source development.
That said, open source also has a long history of providing transparency to developers and a tradition of giving credit were credit it due. This is where much of the discussion on the Web appears to be focused. When we released the ACE library, we chose to recognize the contributions made by the PrimeFaces, jQuery and YUI open source projects in our product collateral and in the product source code. No attempts were made to hide this contribution.
We believed that the level of acknowledgement provided to Prime Technology regarding its contribution was appropriate, commensurate with other cases in the industry, and consistent with the level of benefits realized from the other open source projects, jQuery and YUI. It is clear that others felt the level of acknowledgment was insufficient and in hindsight, perhaps it was. It was certainly not our intent to diminish their contributions and we have taken recent steps to increase the transparency associated with integration of elements of the PrimeFaces, jQuery, and YUI open source libraries.
No. Open source communities are filled with dedicated and passionate members that are used to voicing their opinions. The challenge is to make sure that they have access to all the information they need to come up with a fully informed opinion.
I think we are all guilty of exaggerating numbers when we are engaged in lively and impassioned debate and dialog. I believe a rough number was thrown out early in the dialog as part of a broader point. Unfortunately it was picked up on as gospel and repeated over and over again by others even though it wasn’t accurate at all.
ICEsoft sponsors a number of popular open source projects, including ICEmobile and ICEpdf as well as ICEfaces. All of which are available for free to the open source community. It is unfortunate that this discussion has distracted from the value that they are delivering to the community.
Absolutely. We have in the past and I believe we will continue into the future.
ICEfaces have released an FAQ page which deals with the claims made against them and answers in detail their stance on the whole debacle. PrimeFaces in response issued a final blog – contesting that they had been advised about ICEfaces decision to fork – but that they were satisified with the credit given.
Thankfully it appears that both sides in this argument would prefer to focus on developing for the timebeing – a wise move as we want both to be the best they can. Squabbling really gets us nowhere and we think it’s best to draw a line under the whole issue.