As more details of the lawsuit emerge, bloggers debate why it has taken this long for the Java patents to be leveraged against Google.
Last week, the news broke that Oracle are suing Google over a series of patents. Since then, copies of the complaint, filed in federal court in California, have surfaced, providing fresh insight into the technology at the centre of the debate.
In the complaint, Oracle state that Google were clearly aware of Sun’s patent portfolio, as Google have a history of hiring former Sun Java engineers. Even Google CEO Eric Schmidt is a former Sun employee, and previously led Sun’s Java development team.
“Google’s Android competes with Oracle America’s Java as an operating system software platform for cellular telephones and other mobile devices,” Oracle said in its complaint, before requesting unspecified damages, and for any Google software that is discovered to violate Oracle’s copyrights to “be impounded and destroyed.”
The patents in question were named (United States Patents Nos. 6,125,447; 6,192,476; 5,966,702; 7,426,720; RE38,104; 6,910,205; and 6,061,520.) However, interestingly, in the complaint Oracle also refer to the Dalvik VM. The Dalvik VM was engineered by Google to run compiled Java source code on mobile devices. It effectively allowed Google to leverage Java without paying Sun for use of the Java runtime on Android devices, by compiling into Dalvik bytecode. Android uses the syntax of the Java platform and the Java SE class library, but not Java bytecode or the JVM. Dalvik is explicitly incompatible with the existing Java virtual machine instructions. According to Miguel de Icaza, the rumour is that Dalvik arose because Google and Sun could not reach an agreement over the licensing of Java Micro Edition, so Google engineered Dalvik as a replacement for Java Micro Edition.
Dalvik has always been a contentious issue. Back in 2007, Stefano Mazzocchi referred to Dalvik as “the new name of Sun’s worst nightmares,” before predicting many IP-related lawsuits would centre around Dalvik. However, these never manifested themselves while Sun was in charge of the Java patents. Andrew Savory has theorised that Sun turned a blind eye to Android, because they were concerned with maintaining their reputation, as “companies that opt for patent warfare over innovation are not viewed kindly.” There is also some risk associated with filing a complaint against Dalvik because, if Oracle lose, it might encourage more companies to imitate Google and launch their own Dalvik alternatives, rather than pay Oracle royalties.
Miguel de Icaza has a more controversial view on why Sun did not sue Google: namely that Sun was sold to Oracle, “with a big “Sue Google” sign” and that “by the time Oracle bought Sun, they knew that they would be going after Google and anyone else with a big, fat checkbook that did not have a licensing deal in place.” In his opinion, Sun’s potential to sue Google over the Java patents, was the company’s major selling point. The idea that this lawsuit has been in the pipeline for some time, is supported by James Gosling, who has blogged about integration meetings between Sun and Oracle where he was questioned about the patent situation between Sun and Google.
According to US Today, Google spokesperson Aaron Zamost issued a statement on the lawsuit. “We are disappointed Oracle has chosen to attack both Google and the open-source Java community with this baseless lawsuit. The open-source Java community goes beyond any one corporation and works every day to make the web a better place. We will strongly defend open-source standards and will continue to work with the industry to develop the Android platform,” reads the statement.