Licensing Wars

Is the WebM Project Really Open Source?

Jessica Thornsby
Is-the-WebM-Project-Really-Open-Source

Google accuse the Open Source Initiative of not being ‘open’ enough in WebM licensing fall-out.

At Google IO, Google vice president of product management Sunder
Pichai announced the creation of the WebM project and the release
of the VP8 codec.

Despite initial support from the community, the WebM project has
run into some early problems over licensing, after it came to light
that the new license Google is using for the project is
one that hasn’t been submitted to the Open Source Initiative (OSI)
for approval. In fact, the “field of use” restriction in the patent
grant, has caused further speculation that the license cannot
possibly be approved by the OSI. This would mean that the WebM
project cannot be classed open source.

Google’s open source and public sector engineering manager Chris
DiBona has followed this up by posting a request that the OSI delay consideration of
Google’s WebM license, while the company determine “certain
compatibility issues internally.” He then levelled some surprise
criticism at the organisation, calling for them to open up the list
archives regarding any discussions of WebM. “We are not comfortable
with OSI being closed,” he wrote.

Although Chris DiBona received support from Lawrence Rosen of the
Rosenlaw & Einschlag technology law firm, his post has
attracted much negative feedback from the OSI. Simon Phipps replied “it does sound a little as
if you want to accuse the OSI Board of something here, Chris, or
frame Google as a pioneer for good at the expense of OSI,” and
pointing out that “most others engage with OSI before they publish
a new license and declare it open source.”

However, is it as bad as it seems? Prior to the mailing list
spat, OSI Board member Simon Phipps had blogged that the current WebM license could be
easily rectified to be more open source friendly, and has stated
that “speaking as a member of the OSI Board I’d love to see them
submit a templatised version of this license for approval.”

Regardless of Google’s call for more time, and however ‘closed’
or ‘open’ OSI may be, the modifications that Google need to make to
their new license appear to be minor (by the OSI board’s own
admission) and the initial announcement received much support from
the community. Google want to see VP8 codec open sourced, and the
OSI have previously expressed positive feelings about the project –
now all they need to do is reach an agreement on the license.

Author
Comments
comments powered by Disqus