The inside story

How LinkedIn switched to Continuous Deployment

Elliot Bentley

To adopt the new methodology, the social network’s engineers had to halt site development for two months. Was it worth it?

Just over two years ago,
LinkedIn, the “professional” social network, made the leap from a
waterfall-like development process to continuous deployment. In
the latest
issue of Wired
, VP of engineering Kevin Scott
dished the inside story on the company’s painful transition to a
modern development methodology

Despite being one of the largest social networks,
until Scott
moved from Google to LinkedIn
in early 2011, new features were
developed in isolation for long periods, before being merged into
the trunk.

As you might expect, this approach is risky: these new
features could clash and cause site-breaking errors, and LinkedIn’s
chosen solution – to limit the number of features merged each month
– slowed the site’s development.

When Scott joined the company, he decided to import
Google’s practice of continuous deployment – a strategy quickly
becoming the norm as applications move online. But for an
organisation with around 1,000 employees at the time, this couldn’t
be done overnight. In fact, to train up staff and build the
necessary automated tools, Scott halted site development for a
whole two months.

“It was a pretty big risk the business took, to look
at its engineering team and say, ‘we’re going to completely change
the way we do software… and somewhere in the middle of this
two-month process you’re going to run across a bridge and burn it
behind you,” he told Wired.

Scott’s new regimen should be familiar to those
schooled in continuous integration: new code is submitted via a
version control system and – if it passes automated tests – quickly
merged into the trunk.

“We wanted to be at the point where… as soon as they
were checking in their code… it was qualified and releasable… that
anything sitting in trunk must be releasable at any point in time,
and if it’s not releasable it’s just as significant as a site

Wired list the range of new features rolled out at
LinkedIn since the switch to CD as proof of its success, but
without any solid data to hand, it’s difficult for outsiders to
gauge its true importance.

However, if there’s a lesson to be learned from
LinkedIn’s story, it’s that it’s never too late to adopt more
modern software development methodologies – even after nine years
of something else.

Photo by Sheila

comments powered by Disqus